- Ripple can delay the regulations to guarantee better conditions for a future IPO or securities.
- The withdrawal of the dry of other cryptography proceedings raises questions about the case of prolonged XRP.
The cryptographic industry is witnessing a significant change while the American Commission for Securities and Exchange (SEC), under the Directorate of the Trump era, moves to reject several high -level proceedings against large cryptographic companies.
This includes Opensea, Robinhood, Uniswap (Uni), Gemini, Metamask and Coinbase.
Gary Gensler is no longer at the helm, the regulatory examination seems to be loosening.
However, a legal battle remains firmly in place – the current case between dry and undulation (XRP).
Ripple vs dry continues
In the midst of this uncertainty, the legal expert James Murphy, widely known as Metalrawman, weighed on the case, offering an overview of the possible causes of delay.
While many expected the dry to drop its trial against Ripple, Murphy suggests that the deduction could not come from the regulator, but from Ripple itself.
He argues that Ripple could strategically push a stronger regulation, aimed at having certain aspects of the decision of judge Analisa Torres.
This could potentially create a more favorable legal precedent for the broader company and industry.
He said,
“The (a) conclusion of the violations of the securities law and the (b) injunction (with” bad boy “provisions of the participants) are not so excellent for Ripple. This is particularly true if Ripple envisages a future offer of exempt titles or an IPO. »»
Murphy added,
“I believe that the SEC would have accepted a settlement – where the two parties reject their calls and the SEC underwent the penalty of $ 125 million – at a heart rate.”
What is Murphy trying to indicate?
As expected, Metallawman suggested that Ripple could strategically delay a colony.
He hypothesized that the company could negotiate more favorable conditions, in particular if it had plans for a future offer of exempt titles or a first public offer (IPO).
If this is true, that would explain why Ripple has not yet reached a resolution, despite the recent will of the dry to remove other high -level cryptography proceedings.
Murphy also argued that the SEC would probably have accepted a simple settlement in which the two parties withdrew their calls, and Ripple paid the proposed penalty of $ 125 million.
However, the fact that no agreement of this type was concluded suggests that Ripple could put pressure for better conditions, perhaps to have certain legal decisions canceled.
Its impact
This decision would not only benefit Ripple, but could also create a precedent that influences future regulatory decisions in cryptographic space.
Despite the complexities surrounding the case, Metalrawman remains convinced that a resolution will soon arrive.
He previously predicted that the trial could take longer to settle than other cases of cryptography due to the subtleties of negotiations.
However, with the Ripple deadline to deposit his appeal in appeal on April 16, he thinks that the case will probably end before that.
Until the announcement of an official settlement, the cryptographic community will continue to closely monitor, wishing to see how the result shapes the regulatory landscape of industry.
