Close Menu
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (997)
  • Analysis (1,024)
  • Bitcoin (1,609)
  • Blockchain (1,102)
  • DeFi (1,331)
  • Ethereum (1,342)
  • Market (1,353)
  • Regulation (1,284)
  • Security (1,518)
Hand picked
  • The elevators of the United Kingdom FCA prohibit ETN Crypto for retail investors
  • Cryptography market shaken by the quarrel of Mousque-Trump, but search for optimistic swallowing configurations
  • The UNISWAP DAO drama stimulates the debate on decentralization at Congress – DL News
  • The FCA offers a lifting ban on ETN Crypto for British retail investors
  • Why Fartcoin explodes? Same FRACHE COIN 1 $ after Coinbase News
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
HODLIST
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Subscribe
HODLIST
Home»Market»The hearing of the structure of the crypto market is transformed into partisan claims
Market

The hearing of the structure of the crypto market is transformed into partisan claims

June 7, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
019745e7 67f3 7ed9 b160 e36fcfc4a90e.jpeg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Republican legislators of the Chamber’s Financial Services Committee (HFSC) have rejected the concerns that US President Donald Trump could personally benefit from his exposure to cryptographic industry, rejecting claims as political “theaters” in the midst of the ongoing debate on digital asset legislation.

During a June 6 hearing organized by the Democrats, the member of the HFSC classification, Maxine Waters, defended that the legislators should focus on “the information that was not explored at the committee hearing” on June 4, which concerned concerns concerning the law on the clarity of the digital asset market (clarity). The debate around the bill on the structure of the crypto market, which is expected to go to a vote on June 10, was partly observed by calls for provisions to prevent Trump from potentially using the legislation in personal benefit.